Global
CCC
High exposure, unevenly demonstrated governance
525 assessed · 498 rated
REI 35.2 · ADI 20.6 · T 69.0%
150 ratings at T≥90Weighted monitored field: CC
COMPLETE GEN1 · MARKET POSITIONS
See the field before you enter the decision
The headline bands show comparative position. REI shows exposure, ADI demonstrated governance, and T the share of the evidence surface that can be reconstructed from public sources.
Jurisdiction band field
BUnited Kingdom · North America · Oceania* · European Union
CCLatin America · South & Southeast Asia · Switzerland & SEE* · MENA
CSub-Saharan Africa
DDDEast Asia
* Indicative: fewer than 10 assessed systems. Tied bands share the same comparative position; ranking follows the headline band without decimal tie-breaking.
Industry position
| Industry | n | Band | REI | ADI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Healthcare | 103 | B | 39.1 | 31.4 |
| Public administration & benefits | 49 | B | 44.7 | 26.0 |
| Migration & border | 12 | B | 36.7 | 32.0 |
| Models served as a service | 26 | CCC | 50.2 | 19.2 |
| Platforms & content | 65 | CC | 27.4 | 21.0 |
| Finance & credit | 55 | CC | 28.0 | 17.8 |
| Foundation models | 35 | C | 36.7 | 10.6 |
| Consumer creation & media | 61 | C | 30.5 | 8.3 |
Public sector: B · 111 systems. Private sector: CC · 414 systems. Full tables are available in the final public reports below.
THE DECISION READ
What the band changes for the decision
A RATE AI band is a comparative market position. Its value is knowing what the position means for commitment, evidence, continuity and the next decision - while there is still room to act.
AAA / AA / A
Stronger observed position
Maintain operating discipline
Evidence and control capacity support a stronger comparative position. Keep the evidence current and preserve the conditions behind consequential decisions.
BBB / BB / B
Position under pressure
Close material gaps
The position remains actionable while evidence, ownership or exposure gaps merit active closure before the next material system, market or procurement change.
CCC / CC / C
Executive attention zone
Prioritise evidence and control
The position calls for focused executive attention to evidence, ownership, redesign and decision conditions while corrective choices remain available.
DDD / DD / D
Severe observed position
Protect continuity and evidence
The observed position reflects substantial pressure on defensibility, market access or operating continuity. Evidence preservation, containment and structured response become immediate priorities.
COMPLETE GEN1 · FINAL PUBLIC REPORTS
Four views of the same measured field
Global, jurisdiction, industry and sector reports translate the completed GEN1 field into commercial and institutional decision intelligence.
Global AI Exposure · Complete GEN1
CCC · High exposure, unevenly demonstrated governance
The global report connects external proof, regulatory timing, enterprise service-layer exposure, provider dependence and decision defensibility across 525 assessed AI systems.
Read the global report →PositionWhere does the system sit against the field?
EvidenceWhat can a third party actually verify?
DecisionWhat conditions should change approval, scale or investment?
Industry Intelligence Report
The service layer carries the highest exposure
Open report →Jurisdiction Intelligence Report
The same rating can describe very different decision environments
Open report →Sector Intelligence Report
Public systems lead overall; the advantage changes by market
Open report →THE SIGNAL
Read the result as a decision-maker
The statistics are anchors. The analysis is about what they change for market access, procurement, regulatory readiness, executive accountability and the ability to keep moving.
Evidence & control
The Evidence Premium
150 of 498 ratings sit at T≥90, where the position is point-wise checkable against the public record. Across 278 systems with partially visible governance evidence, a typical system is around two concrete governance records away from a stronger, more independently verifiable position.
Decision questionWhat exact evidence separates our current position from one a counterparty can verify?
Healthcare’s Authorisation Advantage
Healthcare leads the complete large-industry field at B. Of 103 assessed systems, 51 positions sit at T≥90 and 12 are in the A zone. The advantage aligns with authorisation infrastructure that leaves durable, reusable evidence behind.
Decision questionWhich evidence discipline can we import from authorised products into the rest of our AI estate?
Cross-border intelligence
The AI Act Benchmark Gap
122 of 525 AI systems assessed are high-risk under the frozen AI Act benchmark while operating under no binding risk class in force. Twenty-six also show zero publicly demonstrated controls. The gap is a measurable prioritisation map for regulators, boards and investors.
Decision questionWhich systems would become decision-critical if the benchmark became binding tomorrow?
Sector intelligence
The Register Effect
Public AI resolves to B across 111 systems while private AI resolves to CC across 414. The pattern changes by market: private systems lead the public subset in North America, while the UK shows a decisive public advantage and the EU a smaller public lead. Ownership matters less than the evidence infrastructure around the decision.
Decision questionWhat publication mechanism would make our existing governance independently checkable?
Jurisdiction watch: Romania combines low current AI adoption with a national AI strategy and a new European recommendation to clarify AI roles. That creates a governance-before-scale window. Read the analysis →
FROM BAND TO ACTION
Connect the independent position to human intelligence in operation
The public rating shows where the field sits. Independent Human Oversight, Decision Traceability and Dependency Resilience bring that external position into live AI operations.
Decision
Public intelligence shows
Human intelligence in operation
Scale / launch
How the industry and jurisdiction environment is moving.
What the evidence supports for the defined launch or scale decision, with conditions and review triggers.
Procure / partner
Which assurance patterns are visible across the relevant field.
What provider, model and evidence dependencies mean for the procurement decision and contract conditions.
Enter a market
How legal clocks and public-evidence expectations differ across jurisdictions.
What evidence, controls and responsibilities change for the defined deployment.
Respond to scrutiny
What the public band says about the external position.
What was known, who owned the decision, what changed and which evidence and response route apply.
Ratings are governed under the published methodology. Commercial mandates can add independent human oversight, decision traceability, monitoring and resilience around a defined AI operation. Any later band change follows independent evidence admission and reassessment under the published methodology.
Official context used in this release
Collection is continuous. Public aggregate editions follow a quarterly cycle, with the next editions scheduled for December 2026; client reporting runs monthly, on real-time monitoring. RATE AI analyses are cross-read against current official policy and regulatory signals, including EU AI Act implementation, OECD lifecycle accountability, sector regulators, public-sector transparency standards and national AI strategies.
Technical disclosure
Scoring logic, evidence discipline, component analysis and publication rules remain available for technical readers. They provide the technical foundation for the public interpretation.